Thursday, April 5, 2007
Jones v. Bakery Express - Ms. Desserts (Maryland U.S.D.C.)
Signed March 30, 2007--Memorandum and Order by Judge J. Frederick Motz.
In an action for alleged racial discrimination brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment to which Plaintiff (who was represented by counsel) did not respond. The motion was granted because:
First, the summary judgment record contained no direct or indirect evidence that Defendant had a discriminatory attitude in dealing with the Plaintiff;
Second, Plaintiff did not establish on the summary judgment record that her job performance was satisfactory (the second element of a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas protocol); and
Third, Plaintiff did not establish that there were any employees who were not members of the protected class who were retained under apparently similar circumstances (the fourth element of a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas protocol).
The opinion is available in PDF.
In an action for alleged racial discrimination brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment to which Plaintiff (who was represented by counsel) did not respond. The motion was granted because:
First, the summary judgment record contained no direct or indirect evidence that Defendant had a discriminatory attitude in dealing with the Plaintiff;
Second, Plaintiff did not establish on the summary judgment record that her job performance was satisfactory (the second element of a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas protocol); and
Third, Plaintiff did not establish that there were any employees who were not members of the protected class who were retained under apparently similar circumstances (the fourth element of a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas protocol).
The opinion is available in PDF.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment